How did Singapore emerge top in the GFSI given the recent spate of food poisoning incidents?

By December 27, 2019 February 24th, 2020 Health

For two consecutive years, Singapore has topped the Global Food Security Index (GFSI) – an international index developed by The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) and supported by Corteva Agriscience. This global index assesses 113 countries across three broad categories: (1) affordability of food, (2) physical accessibility to food, and (3) safety and nutrition of available food, and reflects people’s ease of obtaining quality and affordable food to meet nutritional needs. Attaining an impressive score of 87.4 that not only topped the list, Singapore was also the sole Asian nation to make it to the top 20. News that the country has again made it to the top spot was announced on Bloomberg, The Straits Times and Yahoo News.

However, given the spate of food poisoning cases that occurred over the past one year, the rating may raise some eyebrows. Let’s have a quick recap before we see if there’s a chance that the cases may have factored into the ranking.

Nov 2018:

Dec 2018:

Feb 2019:

Mar 2019:

  • 52 reported ill and 1 hospitalised at 24A Senoko South Road after consuming food by Stamford Catering.
  • 21 sick at National Junior College Boarding School after catered food by Pro*3 Institutional Catering.

Apr 2019:

Aug 2019:

Nov 2019:

Given these incidents, it seems reasonable to ask how Singapore can still come in first in the international index.

According to the official 2019 GFSI report, the GFSI constitutes four main categories: (1) Affordability, (2) Availability, (3) Quality and Safety, and (4) Natural Resources and Resilience. Each of these categories contain respective indicators and sub-indicators to measure food security status. Overall scores for the GFSI (ranging from 0 to 100) are computed from a weighted average of the first three categories (Affordability, Availability, Quality and Safety), with the fourth category of Natural Resources and Resilience being the adjustment factor which considers climate-related and natural resource risks in assessment of overall ratings.

As food poisoning pertains directly to the category of ‘Quality and Safety’, let’s zoom in to the list of indicators and their respective sub-indicators subsumed within the category:

As highlighted, food safety is a composite indicator comprising three sub-indicators:

  • Agency to ensure the safety and health of food,
  • Percentage of population with access to potable water, and
  • Ability to store food safely.

There is no direct measurement or mention of food poisoning incidents anywhere within the index ratings. The sub-indicator of ‘(1) Agency to ensure the safety and health of food’ also only stands as a binary indicator to measure the existence of regulatory or administrative agencies in a country, with no specific measurement of instances of food poisoning or contamination. It is thus, unlikely that individual cases of food poisoning are considered in the rating, let say, have an impact on the overall indicator, or category.

Moreover, Singapore has safely ticked off all three sub-indicators – having the Singapore Food Agency (SFA) statutory board which oversees the nation’s food safety and food security issues; 100% population access to basic drinking water services; and a similar near 100% population access to electricity – the proxy indicator of access to refrigeration as a reflection of safe food storage capacities.

In light of this, it is unlikely that food poisoning incidents affected the index ratings of the 2019 GFSI.

As its name implies, the main focus of the GFSI is on assessing the situation of food security in nations. Singapore has been consistently working to strengthen self-sufficiency in food produce, expanding its three “food baskets” to diversify import sources, growing the local agri-food industry, as well as supporting local ventures to develop overseas. Regulatory authorities and stringent guidelines for food handlers are also in place to oversee issues relating to food and nutrition. Hence, it is deserved that the nation has once again secured its place as the global leader in food security.

Leave a Reply